Top 60 Cloning Quotes

I laughed when Steven Spielberg said that cloning extinct animals was inevitable. But I’m not laughing anymore, at least about mammoths. This is going to happen. It’s just a matter of working out the details.

At some point, someone will come up with an airtight argument as to why they should have a cloned child. At that point, cloning will be acceptable.

Simon Cowell is trying to get everyone to clone their dogs, and we’ve had our dogs ‘done’ so they can’t have puppies any more. Cloning is like modern day reproducing – reproducing the bits you want.

Many other countries have already banned human cloning, and there are efforts at the UN to make such a ban universal.

Humans are something very different from animals, and the numbers required to get cloning to work in animals are completely prohibitory with humans.

I don’t get jealous of other girls, because I was… raised in a cloning lab to be the perfect woman for Hugh M. Hefner, so, other than the fact that my I.Q.’s probably a little higher than he would like, I have nothing to worry about.

Royalty is either going to do very well with cloning, or it’s going to disappear completely.

If out of concern over cloning, the U.S. Congress succeeds in criminalizing embryonic stem-cell research that might bring treatments for Alzheimer’s disease or diabetes – and Dr. Fukuyama lent his name to a petition that supported such laws – there would be real victims: present and future sufferers of those diseases.

During this period, I became interested in how the new techniques of cloning and sequencing DNA could influence the study of genetics and I was an early and active proponent of the Human Genome Sequencing Project.

Cloning looks like a degrading of parenthood and a perversion of the right relation between parents and children.

Cloning interferon was not something I wanted to get into.

We’re not interested in cloning the Michael Jordans and Michael Jacksons of the world, but rather assisting infertile couples that deserve the right to have a biological child to have one.

Cloning will enable mankind to reach eternal life.

I laughed when Steven Spielberg said that cloning extinct animals was inevitable. But I’m not laughing anymore, at least about mammoths. This is going to happen. It’s just a matter of working out the details.

Cloning interferon was not something I wanted to get into.

I think we can allow the therapeutic uses of nuclear transplant technology, which we call cloning, without running the danger of actually having live human beings born.

We live in a science fictional world with things like cloning and face transplants, and things seem to be getting stranger and stranger.

Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.

If society becomes comfortable with cloning and sees value in true human diversity, then the whole Neanderthal creature itself could be cloned by a surrogate mother chimp – or by an extremely adventurous female human.

In early January I introduced my legislation, which, besides prohibiting Federal funding of human cloning, also expresses the sense of Congress that foreign nations should establish total prohibition on human cloning as well.

If one is seriously interested in preventing reproductive cloning, one must stop the process before it starts.

Suppose that every prospective parent in the world stopped having children naturally, and instead produced clones of themselves. What would the world be like in another 20 or 30 years? The answer is: much like today. Cloning would only copy the genetic aspects of people who are already here.

I am in favor of stem-cell research. I am not in favor of creating new human embryos through cloning.

I take the view that anything you can do to relieve suffering or improve human health will usually be widely accepted by the public – that is to say, if cloning actually turned out to be solving some problems and was useful to people, I think it would be accepted.

I don’t get jealous of other girls, because I was… raised in a cloning lab to be the perfect woman for Hugh M. Hefner, so, other than the fact that my I.Q.’s probably a little higher than he would like, I have nothing to worry about.

Cloning, wow. Who would have thought? There should be a list of people who can and cannot clone themselves.

Simon Cowell is trying to get everyone to clone their dogs, and we’ve had our dogs ‘done’ so they can’t have puppies any more. Cloning is like modern day reproducing – reproducing the bits you want.

The federal and state governments should ban the use of taxpayer funds to support cloning and embryonic stem cell research.

Suppose that every prospective parent in the world stopped having children naturally, and instead produced clones of themselves. What would the world be like in another 20 or 30 years? The answer is: much like today. Cloning would only copy the genetic aspects of people who are already here.

The people who make policy decisions should damned well know what they are talking about before they make the decisions. There is nobody who is an expert on cloning who would be afraid after seeing Attack of the Clones.

What we think is ethical today, we may not have thought ethical five or 10 years ago. Cloning, stem cell research? However we feel about those things today, we may feel differently 10 years from now.

Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.

The irrationality of disgust suggests it is unreliable as a source of moral insight. There may be good arguments against gay marriage, partial-birth abortions and human cloning, but the fact that some people find such acts to be disgusting should carry no weight.

We’ve had cloning in the South for years. It’s called cousins.

I’m trying to grow more limbs in order to multitask at a greater rate and I’m also investigating the possibilities of cloning. Because nothing would be more useful than having multiples of me, and that way, I could do all of the things I’d like to do in the short amount of time we all have here.

The cloning procedure is similar to IVF. The only difference is that the DNA of sperm and egg would be replaced by DNA from an adult cell. What law or principle – secular, humanist, or religious – says that one combination of genetic material in a flask is OK, but another is not?

I would not want to see any relaxation of the law prohibiting human cloning.

Humans are something very different from animals, and the numbers required to get cloning to work in animals are completely prohibitory with humans.

In cloning, in contrast, reproduction is asexual – the cloned child is the product not of two but of one.

The argument has been made in Congress that it is slippery slope if you allow therapeutic, what people people are calling therapeutic cloning, then you will get reproductive cloning.

We live in a science fictional world with things like cloning and face transplants, and things seem to be getting stranger and stranger.

Cloning will enable mankind to reach eternal life.

In early January I introduced my legislation, which, besides prohibiting Federal funding of human cloning, also expresses the sense of Congress that foreign nations should establish total prohibition on human cloning as well.

While that amendment failed, human cloning continues to advance and the breakthrough in this unethical and morally questionable science is around the corner.

I am opposed to both cloning and the destruction of human embryos and adamantly opposed to funding of embryonic stem cell research.

I’m trying to grow more limbs in order to multitask at a greater rate and I’m also investigating the possibilities of cloning. Because nothing would be more useful than having multiples of me, and that way, I could do all of the things I’d like to do in the short amount of time we all have here.

If society becomes comfortable with cloning and sees value in true human diversity, then the whole Neanderthal creature itself could be cloned by a surrogate mother chimp – or by an extremely adventurous female human.

In cloning, in contrast, reproduction is asexual – the cloned child is the product not of two but of one.

Royalty is either going to do very well with cloning, or it’s going to disappear completely.

I am in favor of stem-cell research. I am not in favor of creating new human embryos through cloning.

During this period, I became interested in how the new techniques of cloning and sequencing DNA could influence the study of genetics and I was an early and active proponent of the Human Genome Sequencing Project.

The irrationality of disgust suggests it is unreliable as a source of moral insight. There may be good arguments against gay marriage, partial-birth abortions and human cloning, but the fact that some people find such acts to be disgusting should carry no weight.

It’s very hard to make arguments about the effects of cloning on family relations if family relations are in tatters.

I don’t believe that efforts to prohibit only so-called reproductive cloning can be successful.