Honestly, direct monetary comparisons aren’t helpful. If you’re going to look at remuneration, you have to be realistic about what revenue we’re bringing in for the organisation and the sport. And as it currently stands, women’s cricket is still a cost to the business.
Well, I think as long as people are talking about stimulus, I think the Fed will be thinking about cutting rates because monetary policy is the better way to go because you can turn it on and turn it off.
I’m not willing to compromise my goals for monetary value.
The way forward is for governments to consciously pursue monetary and fiscal stability through setting clear objectives, establishing proper rules, and requiring openness and transparency – the new rules of the game.
Of course I’ve already taken a very modest position on the monetary system, I do take the position that we should just end the Fed.
Monetary policy should remain data dependent, be well communicated, and ensure that inflation expectations remain anchored.
If I am confirmed, I am confident that my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee and I will maintain the focus on long-term price stability as monetary policy’s greatest contribution to general economic prosperity and maximum employment.
It’s a challenge for monetary policy to communicate that our inflation objective is 2 percent.
The monetary policy instruments which Russia has at its disposal are pretty well developed.
One of the big myths about philanthropy is that it’s all about donating funds for a cause. I like to look at it quite differently. Philanthropy is about ‘giving’ – not just in monetary terms but also in non-monetary aspects, like time, ideas, or being a volunteer. Donating money is just a small part of philanthropy.
When monetary policy destroys the currency, it always destroys the middle class.
